skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Sometimes you hear folks justify not attending church be saying something like… “nature is my church” or “I can get closer to God on a mountain top than in a church building”.
Certainly God created nature and it testifies to his existence but does God really want people substituting nature for church? I think not.
Jesus after all in Matthew 16 said that he himself would “build the church”. What kind of sense does it make that Jesus would build a church and make attendance or congregation optional? Here… let me answer that… it makes no sense.
The church is somewhat analogous to the jewish synagogue. Did Jesus attend the synagogue services? Of course he did and so did the apostles.
Those folks who want to go out in nature by themselves to worship God fail to consider what the purpose of the church is.
The church was designed by Jesus Christ to help Christians reach spiritual maturity. Which begs the question… can Christians reach spiritual maturity without the church? If they could then why did Jesus Christ die to establish the church? Why didn’t he just say climb up on that mountain, or look at the stars or watch a bird sing a song and that’s your spiritual service to me?
We can go and observe nature and think about God and his majesty and in fact I recommend it. But on Sundays, Christians need to be in church being encouraged and being built up, serving each other and practicing love towards each other. That’s what Jesus Christ expects of us and is what makes him happy.
A famous college football coach once said… “your actions speak so loud that I can’t hear what you are saying”
He said that in reference to what his young players would say at team meetings or in the locker room and what he saw on the field. In other words they could talk the talk but when it came to the actual walking they came up short.
So too Christians…
we can say we don’t love money until someone asks us for some of it
we can say to our new wife I’ll love you forever and never disappoint you until some rough times come and you meet a more desirable woman
we can say that we attend church every time the saints meet until we have a headache or we’re a little tired or we decide to stay at home and watch services on line.
we can say that we welcome any kind of criticism until some one says our kids aren’t acting appropriately or like when an Elder calls us and says we haven’t seen you in a while and the defenses come up.
We can say we always tell the truth unless we need to cover up some little embarrassing fault
We might say all those noble spiritual things but they’re awfully hard to hear when our actions are making so much noise to the contrary.
In fact, let’s let our righteous actions be so loud that they drown out our speech.
There is a sales technique that is commonly employed by sales people that is a huge key to their business.
They have learned that if you give something to someone that it is in human nature for the receiver to want to give something back.
Hence you will find drug reps. taking doctors to dinner or taking them on free trips or bringing lunch into your clinic. All in the hopes that you will give them a drug order and they can meet the quota that their corporation has placed upon them.
Thats concept works in Christianity as well. Let’s say you identify an individual that you would like to convert to Jesus Christ. What should you do?
First of all one of the greatest testimonies about Jesus Christ is how he has changed your life. They don’t necessarily need to hear that but they do need to see it. How do they see that? By you sharing your life with them so that you can create a seam and insert into that seam the good news of salvation.
That might mean you invite them into your home, you help them with whatever they need. If you hear they have illness in their family you pray with them. You friend them on Facebook. You remember their birthdays, etc. etc. etc.
Like the salesman you are giving up something… you are giving up yourself (just like Jesus did) so that they by human nature will want to give something back. It’s simple human chemistry and it is entirely scriptural.
Sacrifice yourself for the benefit of others. Once their eyes are opened they will thank you for that great gift
Someone once said… “How you treat someone is what they become”
It’s probably not 100% true but most of the time it’s going to be true. Let’s think about this. What if we treated someone in a loving fashion? Would that make them lovable?
If we were patient with them would that make them also patient?
If we treated them with complete trust would they become trustworthy?
If we treated them like we really appreciated them would they have their self esteem lifted up?
If we sought after the other persons well being more than our own would they recognize that and adopt the same trait?
If we refused to become angry even if we are intentionally baited to become angry… would the one provoking us learn to appreciate that quality?
If someone treated us badly could we put that behind us and treated the other person like it never happened… would they recognize that? Would they see the the moral superiority in that type of behavior and work to be the same kind of person? Would they?
The Apostle Paul in 1 Corinthians 13 seemed to think so because he said the exact same thing.
Here’s the thing… not only can we help transform some one else by the way that we treat them but we are also transformed from “faith unto faith”
Don’t treat someone so horribly that they become horrible people… treat them with love as you yourself were treated by Jesus Christ himself and were washed and made clean and made acceptable to God.
Pass the love down.
Sometimes in congregations the question comes up… “what should we do about members who have quit attending?”
S
Some would recommend disfellowshipping them in accordance with what is taught in 1 Corinthians 5.
In my opinion our scenario would not fit 1 Corinthians 5. The fellow was actively involved in a sin that everyone knew about and continued to attend. Paul instructed the congregation to not associate with him in any form or fashion. Taking away that association would cause the fellow to lament what he had lost due to his willful sin.
See the difference? The one who has left the congregation doesn’t care about his association with other Christians so taking that away when he has already disposed of it won’t have the desired affect.
Some would recommend sending a letter to the fellow alerting him that he is no longer a member of the congregation. I’m not sure what the purpose of that would be because he has already given that up by walking away from it.
For these sorts of issues I think about the father and the Prodigal son. The Prodigal son gave up on his family to live a life style that he knew his family would not approve of.
Did the father send him a letter stating… “you are no longer my son”? of course not he continually thought of his lost son and looked earnestly for a change of heart.
Did the father “disfellowship” him? no, again, because the son had already removed his fellowship.
Those weak sheep who stray away need to be searched for and encouraged and not treated in such a way as to drive them away even further.
There’s a difference between a weak sheep and a rebellious sheep.
In 1 Corinthians 3, Paul calls the Corinthian Christians “babes in Christ” who aren’t ready for the “meat” of the word. They had failed to mature as Christians.
Hebrews 6 sheds additional light on this figure of speech. Everyone who is still on the “milk” of the word is “without experience of the word of righteousness”
These spiritual infants are contrasted with spiritual “full-grown men” who are able “by reason of use have their senses exercised to differentiate between good and evil”
The Corinthians who were spiritual babies were actively engaged in sin… they gloried in who baptized them and in so doing diminished those who were baptized by someone else. They failed to “differentiate between good and evil” in their failure to take action against fellow members who were actively engaged in fornication and they had civil law suits against each other. They were whiney little thumb sucking spiritual babies.
Full grown Christians can not only differentiate between the black and white of sin but also are wary of those gray areas… like where a gray activity might lead.
For instance, I made it a policy in my life not to eat lunch or any other kind of meal (by myself) with a woman who was not my wife. Why? because of where it might lead.
I have a friend who is a drug rep. and in the course of his business would go out to eat with young pretty women who were also drug reps. As a friend I told him that if I was him I would not engage in that behavior. He responded… but thats my job.
The next week he told me he had mentioned our conversation to his wife and continued… Rob, why would I go eat a hamburger when I have Filet Mignon at home? I responded, I like Filet Mignon too but every once in a while I like a hamburger.
Grow up as Christians and not only stay away from that black, black sin but also stay away from activities that could lead you in that direction.
Think of all the consequences. Remember 1 Corinthians 10:13
A few thoughts about what was going on in 1 Corinthians 5. As we all know Paul acknowledges the report that one of the Christians in the church at Corinth committed fornication with his father’s wife.
The text does not identify her as his mother but she may well have been. She may have been identified as “wife” to further illustrate that the guilty party had “uncovered his father’s nakedness which is expressly prohibited in the Law (Leviticus 18:7).
The father could have been either alive or deceased. Even deceased his son would “uncover his nakedness” by having sex with his widow.
The woman was certainly not a Christian. If she were she would have received the same admonishment that her Christian lover received. She was probably not a Jew either. She was probably a polytheistic pagan and she may have been a current or former prostitute.
Twice in 1 Corinthians Paul uses the phrase “All things are lawful for me… “ to introduce a conclusion. In 10:23 he draws some conclusions about eating meats sacrificed to idols.
Likewise in 6:12 he is drawing a conclusion about the subject of fornication that was introduced in chapter 5. In this conclusion he states that Christians should not be joined sexually to a prostitute. I think this has reference to the father’s wife that the Christian had sex with.
There was a temple in Corinth to the false Goddess Aphrodite and history records that there were male and female prostitutes available to the devotees of Aphrodite. It’s possible that the father’s wife was engaged in this activity.
Certainly some of these Christians came out of paganism and still may have felt the “hook” of not only the Priestesses of Prostitution but also the eating of meats sacrificed to idols.
Sometimes it takes time to fully eliminate deeply engrained sin in our lives. Fortunately according to 2 Corinthians 2:7 Paul’s admonishment worked and the guilty young Christian man repented of his heinous sin.
